As many are aware earlier in October, Microsoft is officially the new owner for Activision Blizzard King. Roughly two years since the announcement of the purchase, the Xbox firm is now responsible for the publisher conglomerate. Additionally, it was clarified in a press release that CEO Bobby Kotick is to remain at his position until the end of 2023, he shared in an agreement with Phil Spencer.
Of course, Activision was not the only considered party for acquisition by Microsoft. A document shared online revealed that roughly 100 developers & publishers were candidates for potential purchase for Xbox. One of the biggest companies revealed to be considered is Nintendo. This was part of a newer document shared nearing the deal closing back in September.
However, despite the press that was gained by ambition on behalf of Microsoft, Nintendo of America Doug Bowser shares there is no bad blood. In fact, when speaking to Inverse, he said the two remain cordial and in a good relationship.
We have a great relationship with Microsoft. We consider them to be partners in many, many ways, and you only have to look at Nintendo Switch to see that partnership. Obviously, Minecraft is on Nintendo Switch, and we brought Banjo Kazooie to Super Smash Bros. Ultimate. So, we’re looking forward to that partnership continuing.
Speaking on Minecraft, the same is now expected to he handled for Call of Duty when regarding Nintendo. For roughly a decade, the series has been absent from Nintendo consoles. But in an effort to lessen the pushback of the Activision acquisition, Spencer previously shared that the handling for the first-person war shooter will be catered to Nintendo Switch similar to how Minecraft was already offered.
Similarly, Sega offered a similar response as Nintendo. While reports of acquisition was reported in the past, the Japanese publisher told that it fosters a strong bond with the Xbox firm and is looking forward to future partnerships with Microsoft. You can read the full report by heading here.
What are your thoughts on Bowser’s response?
Source: Inverse